Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Session 4

Reflections
What defines a school learning environment?
Basically there are eight areas:
- Leadership: School leaders must share their vision to staff, school culture
- Physical environment: School culture
- Teachers: Teaching methodology, support staff, teacher-student interaction
- Students: Learning styles, emotional learning, attitude
- Working with parents: Parents must be supportive of school activities
- Collaboration with external agencies: greater exposure for our students
- Security: School must be a safe place for our students and teachers
- Budget: Money is important to implement certain programmes

Find this instrument SLCEQ very interesting to use and it can be tied in with Moo's theory. The following are the links:
SLCEQ Instrumentation - Moo's Schema
Student Support - Relationship dimension
Affiliation - Relationship dimension
Professional Interest - Personal growth
Achievement Orientation - Personal growth
Staff Freedom - System maintenance
Participatory Decision Making- System maintenance
Innovation - System maintenance
Resource Adequacy - System maintenance
Work Pressure - System maintenance

Some comments on SLCEQ Instrumentation:
- Better to put SA (Strongly agree) first followed by SD (Strongly disagree)
- Items should be spread over the scales and not put in category. This is to ensure that students or teachers don't get tired of answering the questions and see a pattern.
- Have a gauge of 4 to 5 items per scale
- As a first cut, do not have more than 25 items
- Try out the questionaire with a group first, before implementing with the actual group

I liked the hands-on session on the case study. We had the opportunity to assess a school learning environment and see the positive and negative aspects of the environment and make recommendations to improvement the environment. I could use this questions to assess my own school environment.

I also found a lot of resources that I can use on the eduweb. onlinelearning. I will use some of them when planning my Food and Nutrition lessons.

I also had a taste of answering a questionaire and how to collect data and then to transport it to SPSS. It has been a fruitful session today.

Paired-sample t-test

A t-test is any statistical hypothesis test in which the test statistic has a Student's t distribution if the null hypothesis is true. It is applied when sample sizes are small enough that using an assumption of normality and the associated z-test leads to incorrect inference.

Dependent t-tests are also used for matched-paired samples, where two groups are matched on a particular variable. For example, if we examined the heights of men and women in a relationship, the two groups are matched on relationship status. This would call for a dependent t-test because it is a paired sample (one man paired with one woman). Alternatively, we might recruit 100 men and 100 women, with no relationship between any particular man and any particular woman; in this case we would use an independent samples test.
See link for history, use, assumptions, formulas, calculations, determining type and matched-pair

Cronbach alpha reliability

Cronbach's α (alpha) has an important use as a measure of the reliability of a psychometric instrument. See attachment for formula

Reflections of the first day

On the first day the following is what have I learnt:
- How the theory on Learning Environment was developed from 1930 to 1990 and different people involved.
- In our own groups, we researched on Henry A Murray. His work was focused on personaltiy test. He focused on basic needs in personality which he called psychogenic needs. From the 27 traits, he picked up the three important traits; Power, Affiliation and Achievement.
- The different modes of assessment such as WIHIC and QTI are the most useful modes of assessment to use and they come in prefered and actual form.
- These information is important in our Future Schools, where there must be student engagement in Learning and there must be Knowledge Construction taking place in each of the students where each learner must be actively involved in learning.
- One thing I need to research is Flexible Learning Environment.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Assessing Learning Environments

There are many tools one can use to assess the learning environment but the two useful instruments are: Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) and What is Happening in this Classroom (WIHIC). The scales classified according to Moo's Scheme are from three areas: Relationship dimensions, Personal development dimensions and System maintenance and change dimensions. All these three areas must be coherent so that assessment will be valid.

The hands-on on different theories on papers done by researchers was refreshing. This gave me an idea of what was prescribed then, for example, Henry A. Murray in the 1930's on power, affiliation and achievement is further developed and expanded by other researchers such as Moo as he developed on the schema and we can determine which instruments we want to use. I also learnt that students must be our focus. As teachers, we must create a learning environment where students understand what that has been taught. The old method of chalk-and talk could be deemed obsolete if the whole session is focused on the teacher talking. In didatic teaching, I personally feel that students become passive and the teacher is the one who is sharpening her skills day in and out. Hence, I would recommend that different teaching methodologies and cooperative learning strategies to be used, where the students become engaged in their own learning giving feedback and contribute to the learning circle. In this changing world, students must be taught to take onus of their own learning. And as for assessment, there are many tools can be used to find out whether learning has taken place effectively such as the QTI and WIHIC.

Background of Murray

Henry Murray's earned his bachelor's degree in history in 1915, a medical degree from Columbia in 1919 and then completed a doctorate in biochemistry from Cambridge nine years later.

His start in psychology occurred after reading Jung and eventually arranging a meeting with him. During this meeting, Jung convinced Murray to study psychoanalysis, which he did at Harvard University. After completing his training, Murray actually began teaching psychology and psychoanalytic theory at Harvard, and he remained there for the rest of his professional career.


Murray's Background. See link

Henry A Murray

Henry A Murray focused on basic needs in personality which he called psychogenic needs. He believed these needs were largely at the unconscious level. After researching this area, he narrowed these needs down to 27, although the list and names vary depending on the time frame and the author.

Three of these, especially, have been the focus of study: the need for Power, Affiliation, and Achievement.
The need for Power refers to the desire or need to impact other people, to control or be in a position of influence. Careers that involve these aspects are better suited for high nPow people, such as teachers, psychologists, journalists, and supervisors. They don't necessarily make the best leaders though. Research has found that those with high nPow are more likely to rate an employee higher if that employee has a tendency to schmooz or flatter the subject where those with low or moderate nPow rate employees the same. In this sense, those with high nPow would do well if they also had traits of self-control and objectivity.

The need for affiliation has a long history of research, and studies show that those with a high nAff often have a larger social circle. They spend more time interacting with other such as talking on the phone and writing letters, and they are more likely to be members of social groups or clubs. Those with high nAff are also more likely to get lonely than those low in nAff, so their need for affiliation may be related to their sense of self and their desire for external stimulation.

Those with a high need for achievement (nAch) demonstrate a consistent concern about meeting obligations and accomplishing tasks. They are, however, more focused on internal motivation rather than external rewards. For example, those high in nAch are more likely to value intelligence and personal achievement over recognition and praise.

Preview the link.